<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>

  
  
<title>AnthillPro Blog - Responses</title>
<link>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/</link>
<description>News and Info about AnthillPro.</description>
<language>en</language>
<managingEditor>The AnthillPro Team</managingEditor>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:59 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  

  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Re: A practical approach to the Rebuild Problem</title>
    <link>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/10/22/1224708960000.html#comment1224863039724</link>
    <description>
      If you don&#039;t have a firm regulatory requirement to do rebuilds, I think it&#039;s just not worth the trouble. Back up your codestation repository and make sure your cleanup policies are reasonable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why rebuild if you still have the original build?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, rebuilds done as part of the lifecycle to change debugging parameters or something like that, are best done as secondary processes. I believe we have an earlier blog entry on that.
    </description>
    <author>Eric Minick</author>
    <comments>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/10/22/1224708960000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/10/22/1224708960000.html#comment1224863039724</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Re: A practical approach to the Rebuild Problem</title>
    <link>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/10/22/1224708960000.html#comment1224780403773</link>
    <description>
      Interesting!  We were just discussing this very issue yesterday in our AnthillPro design meeting.  It is definitely a complex problem.
    </description>
    <author>Mark Melvin</author>
    <comments>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/10/22/1224708960000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/10/22/1224708960000.html#comment1224780403773</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Continuous Integration Debate</title>
    <link>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/07/14/1216083300000.html#trackback1222125622464</link>
    <description>
      There is a discussion on CI at UrbanCode here. It is a bit pedantic debating the value of build versus test. I regard a build as a fundamental test of source code self-consistency, which must pass in order to have a software product in which to perform...
    </description>
    <author>Mavericks</author>
    <comments>http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/07/14/1216083300000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.anthillpro.com/blogs/anthillpro-blog/2008/07/14/1216083300000.html#trackback1222125622464</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
